Updated (February 2012): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

61

Nikon Coolpix S9300

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9300

Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Size
Really small
Compact (109×62×31 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Thickness
Thin
1.2"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9300.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$260 - $349

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$397 - $448

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$428

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS

Nikon Coolpix S9300 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$149

Size Smaller
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom More zoom
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310

Pro digicam

$475

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Wide angle Better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9300
Coolpix S9300
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments