Updated (February 2012): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

56

Nikon Coolpix S9300

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9300

Zoom
Great zoom
18x
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9300.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$410

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$398

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Battery life Much longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$308

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support

Nikon Coolpix S9300 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$160 - $227

Size Smaller
Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100

Travel zoom

$230

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$259

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9300
Coolpix S9300
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments