Updated (February 2012): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

64

Nikon Coolpix S9300

44

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9300

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Size
Really small
Compact (109×62×31 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9300.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$447 - $448 body only

$529 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Much larger
Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$379

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS22

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS22

Compact

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Significantly smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S9300 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Travel zoom

Battery life Much longer battery life
Longest exposure Longer exposures
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15

Pro digicam

$549

Aperture Much wider aperture
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Much larger
Nikon Coolpix S3700

Nikon Coolpix S3700

Travel zoom

$89

Size Much smaller
Thickness Significantly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9300
Coolpix S9300
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments