Updated (January 2013): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9500

Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9500

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

56

Nikon Coolpix S9500

38

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9500

Zoom
Great zoom
22x
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 40 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9500.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$499

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$449 - $564

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200

Pro digicam

$199

Overall image quality Better image quality
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S9500 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$276

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$120 - $177

Size Smaller
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9700

Nikon Coolpix S9700

Travel zoom

$239

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
3D Doesn't take 3D photos

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9500
Coolpix S9500
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments