Updated (January 2013): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9500

Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9500

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

60

Nikon Coolpix S9500

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9500

Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Focus points
Many focus points
99
Size
Really small
Compact (110×60×31 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 40 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9500.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$450

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$267 - $349

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$229

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S9500 Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $469 with 15-45mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Touch screen Has a touch screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$169 - $199

Zoom Much more zoom
Battery life Much longer battery life
Size Much larger
Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

Travel zoom

$204

Size Smaller
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9500
Coolpix S9500
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments