Updated (September 2011): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Canon Powershot S100 vs Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

61

Casio Exilim EX-FH100

41

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 24fps
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Longest exposure
Long exposures
30 seconds
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Screen size
Large screen
3"
Size
Really small
Compact (104×60×28 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-FH100.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200

Pro digicam

$334

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Slightly smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$423

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$679 - $680

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Touch screen Has a touch screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Casio Exilim EX-FH100 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX100

Compact

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100

Casio Exilim ZR100

Travel zoom

$259

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Slightly larger

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Casio Exilim EX-FH100
Exilim EX-FH100
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments