Updated (November 2011): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Casio Exilim EX-ZR200

Canon Powershot S100 vs Casio Exilim ZR-200

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

57

Casio Exilim EX-ZR200

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim ZR-200

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,000 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
30 fps
Battery life
Great battery life
480 shots
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-ZR200.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$362

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$625

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$429 - $449

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Overall image quality Better image quality
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Casio Exilim EX-ZR200 Competitors

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100

Casio Exilim ZR100

Travel zoom

$223

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Battery life Shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

Super zoom

Zoom More zoom
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Travel zoom

$280

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Size Significantly larger

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Casio Exilim EX-ZR200
Exilim ZR-200
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments