Updated (November 2011): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Casio Exilim EX-ZR200

Canon Powershot S100 vs Casio Exilim ZR-200

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

60

Casio Exilim EX-ZR200

43

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim ZR-200

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
30 fps
Battery life
Great battery life
480 shots
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Size
Really small
Compact (105×59×29 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-ZR200.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$229

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$435 - $448

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Zoom Much more zoom
Battery life Much longer battery life
Aperture Much narrower aperture

Casio Exilim EX-ZR200 Competitors

Casio Exilim EX-ZR5000

Casio Exilim EX-ZR5000

Digicam

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Significantly larger
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Travel zoom

$323

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Size Significantly larger
Casio Exilim EX-TR50

Casio Exilim EX-TR50

Compact

$400

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Significantly smaller
Built-in flash No built-in flash

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Casio Exilim EX-ZR200
Exilim ZR-200
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments