Sony SLT A58 vs Canon Rebel T5i

Winner
Sony SLT A58

100

Canon Rebel T5i

97

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A58

Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.65x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
8 fps
Really small
Size
Prosumer size (129×95×78 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T5i

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
700 ms startup delay
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T5i.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT A58.

competitors

Sony SLT A58 Competitors

Sony SLT-A68

Sony SLT-A68

Boutique

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Focus points Many more focus points
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Sony SLT-A65

Sony SLT A65

Entry-level DSLR

$866 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Much larger screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$300 body only

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Much larger screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Canon Rebel T5i Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$289 - $549 body only

$326 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Lowest price Cheaper
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$649 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Focus points More focus points
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder
Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$326 body only

$397 - $497 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

discussion

Sony SLT A58
SLT A58
Sony

Report a correction
Canon Rebel T5i
Rebel T5i
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments