Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR vs Canon Rebel T4i

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

51

Canon Rebel T4i

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
320 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
11 fps
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T4i

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T4i.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Super zoom

$500

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Super zoom

$700

Supports RAW Shoots RAW
Size Slightly smaller
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Super zoom

$400

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Lowest price Slightly more expensive

Canon Rebel T4i Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$429 - $649 body only

$520 - $649 with 18-55mm lens

Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$499 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Autofocus Lacks video autofocus
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$285 body only

$360 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR
FinePix HS25 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Canon Rebel T4i
Rebel T4i
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments