Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR vs Canon Rebel T4i

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

55

Canon Rebel T4i

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T4i

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Badge
Autofocuses shooting video
Contrast detection

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T4i.
Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR Competitors

Fujifilm X-S1

Fujifilm X-S1

Pro digicam

$603

True resolution Slightly higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Super zoom

$389

Size Significantly smaller
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$350

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon Rebel T4i Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$420 - $649 body only

$520 - $649 with 18-55mm lens

Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$759 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Autofocus Lacks video autofocus
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$268 body only

$330 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR
FinePix HS50EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Canon Rebel T4i
Rebel T4i
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments