Canon Rebel SL1 vs Fujifilm X-E2

Canon Rebel SL1
Fujifilm X-E2

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel SL1

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-E2

Size
Really small
Mid size (129×75×37 mm)
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
1.64x
Thickness
Thin
1.5"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel SL1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-E2.

competitors

Canon Rebel SL1 Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$335 - $699 body only

$370 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$649 with 18-55mm lens

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Color depth Better color depth
Size Larger
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$435 - $649 body only

$449 - $549 with 18-55mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Overall image quality Worse image quality

Fujifilm X-E2 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$445 - $448 body only

$470 - $498 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$599 body only

$699 with 16-50mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Nikon D5600

Nikon D5600

Entry-level DSLR

$549 - $647 body only

$629 - $797 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Lens availability Much more lenses available
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder

discussion

Canon Rebel SL1
Rebel SL1
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-E2
X-E2
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments