Canon Rebel SL1 vs Fujifilm X-E1

Canon Rebel SL1
Fujifilm X-E1

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel SL1

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-E1

Size
Really small
Mid size (129×75×38 mm)
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%
Thickness
Thin
1.5"
Weight
Light-weight
350 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel SL1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-E1.

competitors

Canon Rebel SL1 Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$317 - $649 body only

$376 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Longer battery life
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$425 - $649 body only

$517 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Overall image quality Worse image quality
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$349 body only

$399 - $420 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Battery life Longer battery life
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

Fujifilm X-E1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-M1

Fujifilm X-M1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$400 body only

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$599 - $1,299 body only

$949 - $1,026 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16

Pro digicam

$550

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Canon Rebel SL1
Rebel SL1
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-E1
X-E1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments