Updated (September 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot S110 vs Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs Canon PowerShot S110

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

100

Canon PowerShot S110

69

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
High true resolution
True resolution
20 MP
Great battery life
Battery life
330 shots
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S110

Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×27 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Pro digicam

$598

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Weight Significantly heavier
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Sensor size Much smaller sensor
Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Travel zoom

$1,198

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Narrower aperture

Canon PowerShot S110 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$399

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom Much less zoom
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$544 - $649

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Size Significantly larger
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$202 - $209

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
Cybershot DSC-RX100
Sony

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot S110
PowerShot S110
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments