differences

Advantages of the Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Report a correction
Screen resolution
Significantly higher resolution screen
922k dots vs 460k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Zoom
More zoom
25x vs 20x
Help
Around 60% more zoom
Aperture
Wider aperture
f/3.2 vs f/3.5
Help
At its widest zoom, the PowerShot SX620 HS's lens captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops)
Lowest price
Cheaper
$164.00 vs $268.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $104 cheaper (around 40% less)
Fastest shutter speed
Faster max shutter speed
1/2000s vs 1/1600s
Help
20% faster max shutter speed
Longest exposure
Longer exposures
15s vs 4s
Help
Around 4x longer exposures
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS Learn more about
the Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Advantages of the Sony DSC-WX350

Report a correction
Light sensitivity
Better maximum light sensitivity
12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The DSC-WX350's maximum light sensitivity is 4 f-stops better
Continuous shooting
Shoots faster
10 fps vs 2.5 fps
Help
4x faster continuous shooting
Size
Slightly smaller
96×55×26 mm vs 97×57×28 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Weight
Lighter
137 g vs 182 g
Help
More than 20% lighter
Thickness
Thinner
1" vs 1.1"
Help
Around 10% thinner
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 Learn more about
the Sony DSC-WX350
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent travel zooms, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS Canon PowerShot SX620 HS 58
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        53 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths
              Built-in flash Each has a built-in flash Help
              Usually standard
              Screen size Larger than average screens Help
              3"
              Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
              1. Lens
              Thickness Thin Help
              PowerShot SX620 HS1.1"
              DSC-WX3501"
              Lowest price Inexpensive Help
              PowerShot SX620 HS$164.00
              DSC-WX350$268.00
              Common Weaknesses
              Fastest shutter speed Slow max shutter speed Help
              PowerShot SX620 HS1/2000s
              DSC-WX3501/1600s
              Viewfinder No viewfinders Help
              Can only preview photos on the screen
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Touch screen No touchscreens Help
              More buttons
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              PowerShot SX620 HS2.5 fps
              DSC-WX35010 fps
              Sensor size Very small sensors Help
              1/2.3" 6.17x4.55mm
              External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
              Limited to the in-camera mic
              True resolution Capture low resolution images Help
              9.7 MP

              Compared to recent travel zooms

              Common Strengths
              Size Very small Help
              PowerShot SX620 HS97×57×28 mm
              DSC-WX35096×55×26 mm
              Weight Light weight Help
              PowerShot SX620 HS182 g
              DSC-WX350137 g
              Common Weaknesses
              Longest exposure Short max exposure time Help
              PowerShot SX620 HS15s
              DSC-WX3504s
              Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
              PowerShot SX620 HS3,200 ISO
              DSC-WX35012,800 ISO

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot SX620 HS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot SX620 HS
              PowerShot SX620 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
              Cyber-shot DSC-WX350
              Sony

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments