Canon PowerShot SX620 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

100
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

66

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Really small
Size
Compact (97×57×28 mm)
Light-weight
Weight
182 g
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Thickness
 Thin
1.1"
Size
 Really small
Compact (105×61×27 mm)
Weight
 Light-weight
191 g
More detailed differences and similarities →

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$299 - $315

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Much larger
Compare the PowerShot SX720 HS vs the PowerShot SX620 HS
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Travel zoom

$268 - $470

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Zoom Less zoom
Compare the Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 vs the PowerShot SX620 HS
Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Travel zoom

$341

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Zoom Significantly more zoom
Size Much larger
Compare the Cyber-Shot HX60 vs the PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220

Travel zoom

$198 - $228

Size Significantly smaller
Aperture Wider aperture
Zoom Less zoom
Compare the Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 vs the PowerShot SX610 HS
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Travel zoom

$268 - $470

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Wider aperture
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Compare the Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 vs the PowerShot SX610 HS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Travel zoom

$298

Aperture Wider aperture
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Larger
Compare the Lumix DMC-ZS45 vs the PowerShot SX610 HS
More detailed differences and similarities →

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS
PowerShot SX620 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS
PowerShot SX610 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments

More detailed differences and similarities →