Canon PowerShot SX510 HS vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

Tie
Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

47

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

46

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Really small
Size
Standard size (104×70×80 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

Battery life
Great battery life
400 shots
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Travel zoom

$120 - $150

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Olympus OM-D E-M10

Olympus OM-D E-M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$439 - $450 body only

$499 - $500 with 14-42mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon EOS 700D

Canon EOS 700D

Entry-level DSLR

$496 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ45

Super zoom

Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$493 - $598

Movie format Higher resolution movies
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Super zoom

$342 - $446

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Size Larger

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
PowerShot SX510 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47
Lumix DMC-FZ47
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments