Fujifilm FinePix S8200 vs Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix S8200

49

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S8200

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.9
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Size
Really small
Standard size (104×70×80 mm)
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Weight
Light-weight
349 g
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS.
Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S8200.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820

Super zoom

$180

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Super zoom

$110 - $159

Size Significantly smaller
Thickness Significantly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$169 - $209

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Super zoom

$179 - $180

Zoom More zoom
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Super zoom

$150 - $168

Aperture Wider aperture
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$150

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Wider aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S8200
FinePix S8200
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
PowerShot SX510 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments