Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

55

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Screen size
Large screen
3"
Battery life
Great battery life
450 shots
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$338 - $449

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$498 - $697

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$215 - $257

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V Competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

Super zoom

$395

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$491

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Super zoom

$175 - $178

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Lowest price Cheaper
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments