Advantages of the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS |
 |
|
Much more zoom |
50x |
vs |
33.8x |
|
More than 2x more zoom |
|
|
 |
|
Supports 24p |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Get that real film feel |
|
|
 |
|
Records high-speed movies |
240 fps |
vs |
None |
|
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion |
|
|
 |
|
Shoots RAW |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Digitally develop your own photos with precise image control |
|
|
 |
|
Supports an external flash |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
An external flash often produces better looking flash images |
|
|
 |
|
Shoots faster |
13 fps |
vs |
10 fps |
|
30% faster continuous shooting |
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the Sony DSC-HX200V |
 |
|
Significantly wider aperture |
f/2.8 |
vs |
f/3.4 |
|
At its widest zoom, the DSC-HX200V's lens captures marginally more light (0.6 f-stops) |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly higher resolution screen |
921k dots |
vs |
461k dots |
|
Around 2x higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
|
Can create panoramas in-camera |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective |
|
|
 |
|
Takes 3D photos |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image |
|
|
 |
|
Better maximum light sensitivity |
12,800 ISO |
vs |
6,400 ISO |
|
The DSC-HX200V's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better |
|
|
 |
|
Larger screen |
3.0" |
vs |
2.8" |
|
Around 10% larger screen |
|
|
 |
|
Has a GPS |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly longer battery life |
450 shots |
vs |
315 shots |
|
More than 40% more shots per battery charge |
|
|
 |
|
Smaller |
122x87x93 mm |
vs |
123x87x106 mm |
|
More than 10% smaller |
|
|
|
|
Thinner |
3.7" |
vs |
4.2" |
|
More than 10% thinner |
|
|
 |
|
Cheaper |
$326.99 |
vs |
$429.00 |
|
The best price we've seen is $102 cheaper (more than 20% less) |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly faster max shutter speed |
1/4000s |
vs |
1/2000s |
|
2x faster max shutter speed |
|
|
 |
|
Longer exposures |
30s |
vs |
15s |
|
2x longer exposures |
|
|
|
|
|
Showing 0 comments