Panasonic Lumix FZ72 vs Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Winner
Panasonic Lumix FZ72

65

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

61

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Great zoom
Zoom
60x
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
20 mm
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Dynamic range
Wide dynamic range
11.2 EV
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix FZ72.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix FZ72 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$391

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Zoom Much less zoom
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$199 - $257

Size Significantly smaller
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom Much less zoom
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$498

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom Much less zoom

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$429 - $479

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$360

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Super zoom

$220 - $279

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix FZ72
Lumix FZ72
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments