Panasonic Lumix FZ72 vs Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Winner
Panasonic Lumix FZ72

68

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

60

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Great zoom
Zoom
60x
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
20 mm
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Overall image quality
Great image quality
47.0
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Color depth
Great color depth
20.3 bits

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix FZ72.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix FZ72 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$317 - $319

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Zoom Much less zoom
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$257 - $297

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Significantly smaller
Zoom Significantly less zoom
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$398 - $479

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$398 - $479

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom Significantly more zoom
Supports 24p No 24p support
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$514 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Super zoom

$256 - $279

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix FZ72
Lumix FZ72
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments