Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P520

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

100

vs

Nikon Coolpix P510

78

Nikon Coolpix P510

Runner-up
 
 
 
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Zoom
Great zoom
50x
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
13 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P510

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

differences

Advantages of the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Zoom Significantly more zoom 50x vs 41.7x
Help
More than 40% more zoom
Supports RAW Shoots RAW Yes vs No
Help
Digitally develop your own photos with precise image control
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 13 fps vs 7 fps
Help
Around 90% faster continuous shooting
Battery life Longer battery life 315 shots vs 200 shots
Help
Around 60% more shots per battery charge
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies 240 fps vs 120 fps
Help
2x higher fps
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The PowerShot SX50 HS's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
External flash Supports an external flash Yes vs No
Help
An external flash often produces better looking flash images
Macro focus Better macro capability 0 cm vs 2 cm
Help
Almost the same
Longest exposure Longer exposures 15s vs 8s
Help
Around 90% longer exposures
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Learn more about
the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Advantages of the Nikon P510

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen 921k dots vs 461k dots
Help
Around 2x higher resolution screen
Aperture Wider aperture f/3.0 vs f/3.4
Help
At its widest zoom, the P510's lens captures marginally more light (0.4 f-stops)
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Screen size Larger screen 3.0" vs 2.8"
Help
Around 10% larger screen
GPS Has a GPS Yes vs No
Help
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling
Size Smaller 120x83x102 mm vs 123x87x106 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Weight Slightly lighter 555 g vs 595 g
Help
Around 10% lighter
Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed 1/4000s vs 1/2000s
Help
2x faster max shutter speed
Thickness Slightly thinner 4" vs 4.2"
Help
Almost the same
Lowest price Slightly cheaper $345.00 vs $369.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $24 cheaper (around 10% less)
Nikon Coolpix P510 Learn more about
the Nikon P510
vs

recommendations

Relative to the best recent super zooms, and ignoring price

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
100 vs 78
Explain scores
Nikon Coolpix P510 Nikon Coolpix P510
Green arrow Snapsort recommends the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.

similarities

Compared to recent digicams

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Zoom Incredible zoom Help
PowerShot SX50 HS:50x
P510:41.7x
Screen flips out Flip-out screens Help
Great for movies
Movie format Full HD (1080p) video Help
PowerShot SX50 HS:1080p @ 24fps
P510:1080p @ 30fps
HDR In-camera HDR Help
Combines multiple exposures
Sensor type Better sensor types Help
Better in low light
Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
Lens
Macro focus Good macro capabilities Help
PowerShot SX50 HS:0 cm
P510:2 cm
Viewfinder Both have digital viewfinders Help
Digital
Thickness Quite thick Help
PowerShot SX50 HS:4.2"
P510:4"
Lowest price Very expensive Help
PowerShot SX50 HS:$369.00
P510:$345.00
Weight Heavy Help
PowerShot SX50 HS:595 g
P510:555 g
Size Large Help
PowerShot SX50 HS:123x87x106 mm
P510:120x83x102 mm

Compared to recent super zooms

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Battery life Few shots per battery charge Help
PowerShot SX50 HS:315 shots
P510:200 shots

dxomark

DXOMark

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520

Super zoom

$427

Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
HDR Lacks a built in HDR feature
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$448

Light sensitivity Significantly higher maximum light sensitivity
Longest exposure Slightly longer exposures
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Weight Is slightly heavier
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$548

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Battery life Has a much longer battery life
Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
Color depth Has slightly less color depth
Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

Super zoom

$219 - $229

Size Is slightly smaller
Thickness Is thinner
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Viewfinder Doesn't have a viewfinder
Canon Powershot SX40

Canon Powershot SX40

Super zoom

$299 - $315

Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
Battery life Has a slightly longer battery life
HDR Lacks a built in HDR feature
Screen resolution Has a slightly lower resolution screen
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Super zoom

$348 - $478

Light sensitivity Significantly higher maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Has a significantly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Zoom Has significantly less zoom
Fujifilm FinePix SL1000

Fujifilm FinePix SL1000

Super zoom

$329 - $399

High-speed framerate Records even higher-speed movies
Light sensitivity Significantly higher maximum light sensitivity
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Thickness Is thicker

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Super zoom

$428 - $550

Autofocus Faster autofocus
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports 24p No 24p support
Zoom Significantly less zoom

Nikon Coolpix P510 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Fujifilm FinePix S8200

Fujifilm FinePix S8200

Super zoom

$209 - $299

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

appearance

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Nikon Coolpix P510
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Nikon Coolpix P510
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Nikon Coolpix P510

discussion

Showing 8 comments

Serg (1:15 PM, May 21, 2013)
I have Canon T3i (domestic and portrait camera) and Nikon P510 (as a travel camera).

Purchased and returned SX50, similar Panasonic, Fuji, Samsung ultrazoom cameras.

Canon was OK, except the price, and 12MP only matrix - it counts when you use max zoom and try to get smth "panoramic".

All other cameras gave colors distortion, Fuji (not raw) especially.

GPS actually was helpful when I was on resort in Cuba and tagged all "wild" travel, snorkeling and scuba locations.

It's great to remember my best fishing spots (I'm from Canada), and who cares about battery draining when you have an extra one in box.

Yes, Nikon has problems with autofocus (P mode works better for me with minimum of focusing points) when you are trying to shot pictures from the fast moving bus bumping on Cuban roads. Canon is great. But still, 12MP vs 16MP and the price...

Never had problems with focus while zooming videos.

Adjustable electronic viewfinder is very useful for everybody who uses reading glasses so see anything on the screen.

So I'll be using this Nikon for a while till Canon gives me $300 (max), minimum x50 zoom camera with 20MP (at least) :-)
 
Angie (6:06 PM, March 02, 2013)
How did Canon miss the panorama feature on its Sx50 HS?
 
Boba (0:23 PM, January 10, 2013)
And Russia agree with You!
 
Avatar for Drew Crawford Drew Crawford (9:19 PM, January 07, 2013)
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Video Test
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvX7ECCBPnU
 
Kim (3:42 AM, December 13, 2012)
I fell for that nice looking red
camera trick as well. Looked great. Only had it a week and sent it back
to the shop for a swap with the sx50 and love the camera. I had a sx40
first but did not like the grip. Nikon have a nice rubber grip that
feels great but there it stops. Picture quality from the nikon was best
of the 3 IMO. Problem was the auto focus was slow and I only had about
50 % keep rate for pictures, the rest were a fuzzy mess. Were the nikon
failed for me was its video. Once again I would start a clip ok and then
move with the subject or pan in for a closer look and the auto focus
would simply stop working so once again only a small percentage of kept
clips.

When I brought the SX50 I was blown away with its all
round performance compaired to the nikon. Best thing I have ever done
and I get to keep most of the images and clips I shoot now.

Do the people doing this review even use the cameras to see there results. I think not.

I
are not a perfessional camera man or anything else for that matter,
just joe bloggs off the street that wants to do a bit of wildlife
photography and capture family gatherings from time to time so a pick up
and shoot camera will do me fine. I do not want to know the tech
stuff,just shoot
 
Avatar for Carpist Carpist (4:46 PM, November 16, 2012)
I don't believe light and smaller is necessarily a plus when using a super zoom lens. It's easier to hold a heavy camera steady. The only complaint I have for the sx50 is that I inadvertently push either the menu or the exposure bias button when holding the camera. The function wheel is in the wrong spot, directly under your thumb pad. Other than that, a GREAT camera !!
 
peter (10:57 AM, November 09, 2012)
I meant I don't see how Nikon gets 100 and wins. Oops
 
Peter (10:56 AM, November 09, 2012)
Nikon bias!

I don't see how Nikon P510! Clearly someone who gets paid for Nikon wrote the Nikon P510 review.

You haven't metioned these cons of the Nikon P510

The screen only goes up and down, it does not rotate.

The focus is very slow at 42x zoom

It has GPS which pushes the price up for no reason and drains the battery

You need to update your old dated reviews. Anyone who buys a camera with your "advice" is going to get a bad deal and ripped off.