Updated (February, 2014): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P530

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

100

vs

Nikon Coolpix P520

69

Nikon Coolpix P520

Runner-up
     

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

High ISO
Light sensitivity
6,400 ISO
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Shoots RAW
Supports RAW
Better editing
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P520

Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

differences

Advantages of the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Report a correction
Supports 24p
Supports 24p
Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Zoom
More zoom
50x vs 41.7x
Help
More than 40% more zoom
Battery life
Significantly longer battery life
315 shots vs 200 shots
Help
Around 60% more shots per battery charge
Supports RAW
Shoots RAW
Yes vs No
Help
Digitally develop your own photos with precise image control
High-speed framerate
Higher speed movies
240 fps vs 120 fps
Help
2x higher fps
Light sensitivity
Better maximum light sensitivity
6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The PowerShot SX50 HS's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
External flash
Supports an external flash
Yes vs No
Help
An external flash often produces better looking flash images
Longest exposure
Slightly longer exposures
15s vs 8s
Help
Around 90% longer exposures
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Learn more about
the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Advantages of the Nikon P520

Report a correction
3D
Takes 3D photos
Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Screen resolution
Significantly higher resolution screen
921k dots vs 461k dots
Help
Around 2x higher resolution screen
Screen size
Significantly larger screen
3.2" vs 2.8"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Aperture
Wider aperture
f/3.0 vs f/3.4
Help
At its widest zoom, the P520's lens captures marginally more light (0.4 f-stops)
Panorama
Can create panoramas in-camera
Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
GPS
Has a GPS
Yes vs No
Help
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling
Continuous shooting
Shoots faster
7 fps vs 2.2 fps
Help
More than 3x faster continuous shooting
Macro focus
Better macro capability
1 cm vs 2.4 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 2.4x closer to the lens
Size
Slightly smaller
125x84x102 mm vs 123x87x106 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller
Weight
Slightly lighter
550 g vs 595 g
Help
Around 10% lighter
Thickness
Slightly thinner
4" vs 4.2"
Help
Almost the same
Nikon Coolpix P520 Learn more about
the Nikon P520
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent super zooms, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Canon PowerShot SX50 HS 100
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        69 Nikon Coolpix P520 Nikon Coolpix P520
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths
              Zoom Great zoom Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:50x
              P520:41.7x
              Screen flips out Flip-out screens Help
              Great for movies
              HDR In-camera HDR Help
              Combines multiple exposures
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Viewfinder Both have digital viewfinders Help
              Digital
              Common Weaknesses
              Thickness Quite thick Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:4.2"
              P520:4"
              Weight Heavy Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:595 g
              P520:550 g
              Size Large Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:123x87x106 mm
              P520:125x84x102 mm
              Focus points Few focus points Help
              9

              Compared to recent super zooms

              Common Strengths

              Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

              Common Weaknesses
              External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
              Limited to the in-camera mic

              dxomark

              DXOMark

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon Coolpix P600

              Nikon Coolpix P600

              Super zoom

              $320 - $397

              Zoom Has significantly more zoom
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Nikon Coolpix P530

              Nikon Coolpix P530

              Super zoom

              $297

              Screen flips out Doesn't have a screen which flips out
              Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

              Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

              Super zoom

              $398 - $499

              Shutter lag Has much less shutter lag
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

              Super zoom

              $468

              External mic jack Has an external mic jack
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

              Super zoom

              $350 - $598

              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              External mic jack Has an external mic jack
              Light sensitivity (boost) Slightly lower boost light sensitivity
              Dynamic range Has slightly narrower dynamic range
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

              Super zoom

              $248 - $345

              Zoom Has significantly more zoom
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Light sensitivity (boost) Slightly lower boost light sensitivity
              Screen flips out Doesn't have a screen which flips out
              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Super zoom

              $207 - $250

              Size Is slightly smaller
              Thickness Is thinner
              Viewfinder Doesn't have a viewfinder
              HDR Lacks a built in HDR feature

              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

              Super zoom

              $479 - $549

              Zoom Significantly more zoom
              External mic jack Has an external mic jack
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Size Larger

              Nikon Coolpix P520 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              No significant competitors found that are specific to the Nikon Coolpix P520.

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Nikon Coolpix P520
              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Nikon Coolpix P520
              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
              PowerShot SX50 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Nikon Coolpix P520
              Coolpix P520
              Nikon

              Report a correction

              Showing 3 comments

              Avatar for Maarten Lucas Maarten Lucas (10:00 PM, September 14, 2013)
              because it depends on the objective you use, not on the DSLR-camera (the body)
               
              Avatar for Khuram Shahzad Khuram Shahzad (10:03 AM, May 05, 2013)
              Why the Optical zoom is not mentioned in the Feauture and comparing of DLRs camera's? why? if mentioned then where???
               
              Avatar for Adam Green Adam Green (5:14 AM, April 07, 2013)
              I just compared these two (Canon SX50 vs Nikon P520) and the Canon was a slam dunk on image quality.
              I still want manual zoom and focus rings with scroll wheel dials for white balance and iso, but the Canon SX50 is very good for such an affordable "travel zoom" camera. Now, on to play with the new Sony HX300 ...