Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

66

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

52

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Great image quality
Overall image quality
47.0
Really small
Size
Professional size (123×87×106 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
320 fps
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
800 ms startup delay
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$389 - $449

Zoom Significantly more zoom
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports 24p No 24p support
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$274

3D Takes 3D photos
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$597

Zoom Much more zoom
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Super zoom

$435

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Size Larger
Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Super zoom

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Slightly smaller
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Super zoom

$525

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR
FinePix HS30 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments