vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
13 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Badge
Autofocuses shooting video
Contrast detection
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix SL1000

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
920k dots
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
480 fps
Light sensitivity
High ISO
12,800 ISO
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Report a correction
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Size Smaller 123x87x106 mm vs 123x89x123 mm
Help
Around 20% smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 13 fps vs 10 fps
Help
30% faster continuous shooting
Macro focus Better macro capability 0 cm vs 1 cm
Help
Almost the same
Thickness Thinner 4.2" vs 4.8"
Help
More than 10% thinner
Weight Lighter 595 g vs 659 g
Help
Around 10% lighter
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Learn more about
the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Advantages of the Fujifilm SL1000

Report a correction
Aperture Wider aperture f/2.9 vs f/3.4
Help
At its widest zoom, the SL1000's lens captures marginally more light (0.5 f-stops)
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen 920k dots vs 461k dots
Help
Around 2x higher resolution screen
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Screen size Larger screen 3.0" vs 2.8"
Help
Around 10% larger screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
Help
The SL1000's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies 480 fps vs 240 fps
Help
2x higher fps
Battery life Longer battery life 350 shots vs 315 shots
Help
More than 10% more shots per battery charge
Lowest price Cheaper $249.00 vs $379.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $130 cheaper (more than 30% less)
Longest exposure Longer exposures 30s vs 15s
Help
2x longer exposures
Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 Learn more about
the Fujifilm SL1000
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent super zooms, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Canon PowerShot SX50 HS 100
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        71 Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 Fujifilm FinePix SL1000
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Zoom Incredible zoom Help
              50x
              Screen flips out Flip-out screens Help
              Great for movies
              Movie format Full HD (1080p) video Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:1080p @ 24fps
              SL1000:1080p @ 60fps
              Supports RAW RAW support Help
              Better editing
              High-speed framerate Very high speed movies Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:240 fps
              SL1000:480 fps
              Macro focus Good macro capabilities Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:0 cm
              SL1000:1 cm
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              External flash Support external flash Help
              Better lighting
              Viewfinder Both have digital viewfinders Help
              Digital
              Thickness Quite thick Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:4.2"
              SL1000:4.8"
              Weight Heavy Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:595 g
              SL1000:659 g
              Size Large Help
              PowerShot SX50 HS:123x87x106 mm
              SL1000:123x89x123 mm

              Compared to recent super zooms

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

              Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

              External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
              Limited to the in-camera mic

              dxomark

              DXOMark

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

              Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

              Super zoom

              $398 - $400

              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              External flash Doesn't support an external flash
              Nikon Coolpix P600

              Nikon Coolpix P600

              Super zoom

              $447

              Zoom Has significantly more zoom
              External mic jack Has an external mic jack
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              External flash Doesn't support an external flash
              Nikon Coolpix P520

              Nikon Coolpix P520

              Super zoom

              $321 - $376

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              GPS Has a built-in GPS
              External flash Doesn't support an external flash
              Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

              Super zoom

              $405 - $598

              External mic jack Has an external mic jack
              Battery life Has a significantly longer battery life
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Light sensitivity Slightly lower maximum light sensitivity
              Panasonic Lumix FZ70

              Panasonic Lumix FZ70

              Super zoom

              $398

              Zoom Has significantly more zoom
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Screen flips out Doesn't have a screen which flips out
              Light sensitivity Slightly lower maximum light sensitivity
              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Super zoom

              $219 - $230

              Size Is significantly smaller
              Thickness Is thinner
              Viewfinder Doesn't have a viewfinder
              External flash Doesn't support an external flash
              Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

              Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

              Super zoom

              $349 - $441

              True resolution Takes slightly higher resolution photos
              External mic jack Has an external mic jack
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker

              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

              Super zoom

              $468

              Aperture Wider aperture
              Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

              Fujifilm FinePix SL1000 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Fujifilm FinePix S8200

              Fujifilm FinePix S8200

              Super zoom

              $201 - $249

              Battery life Significantly longer battery life
              Size Slightly smaller
              Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
              Zoom Less zoom

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Fujifilm FinePix SL1000
              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Fujifilm FinePix SL1000

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
              PowerShot SX50 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Fujifilm FinePix SL1000
              FinePix SL1000
              Fujifilm

              Report a correction

              Showing 8 comments

              Total (10:46 AM, March 14, 2014)
              Snapsort is a joke....do you try out the cameras or just look at the specs when making these comparisons???
               
              Avatar for Wolfe Leon Fox Wolfe Leon Fox (7:12 AM, October 17, 2013)
              Try this experiment. Take a pro photographer, send him to an assignment and don't let him use any other camera except that he choose either of the two, i.e., SX50HS or SL1000, according to their (cameras) capabilities. In this case, popularity would not be an issue.
               
              Rob (7:55 PM, October 14, 2013)
              The Canon is a highly rated camera. I don't think its junk. But the Fuji SL1000 and the Sony DSC HX300 are also good although I'd rate the Sony third because it doesn't shoot RAW. I rank the Fuji SL100 ahead of the Sony but you wont go wrong with any of them. It's a matter of preference. Sony is the most compact but its LCD display is inferior to the other two, and doesn't get high marks for low light. The Fuji SL1000 seems to have it all and picture quality is a tossup.
               
              Rob (7:36 PM, October 14, 2013)
              The Canon gets 90 points for popularity and the Fujitsu gets zero points for unknown information. What a farce!! Popularity is subjective and should not even be in included in an unbiased objective comparison. Take out popularity and the Fujitsu wins!! I have spent three days comparing super zooms and the Canon wins most of the discussions for a slightly higher picture quality however not in low light. The Fujitsu has many other better features and the difference in image quality is so minor as to not offset its advantages. Personally I like the more professional look, feel, and size of the Fujitsu. Musch easier to grip the Fujitsu firmly, and the price is amazing! I'm going with the Fujitsu SL1000.
               
              Avatar for Gord Harding Gord Harding (6:27 PM, July 22, 2013)
              i concur. Reviewers are always biased towards the bigger name brands. They always take the approach that they are comparing a Mercedes to a Volkswagen. It's always best to draw your own conclusions after you have thoroughly tested all the features and capabilities of the Fuji.
               
              Daniel (3:31 AM, June 23, 2013)
              I find this review to be very inaccurate, not all the info was put in for the Fuji so its score was much lower and it was largely rated on popularity wich is unfair to the Fuji.
               
              WICKHAMFORD JANE (1:49 PM, May 24, 2013)
              WHY DO YOU SAY IT IS A PIECE OF JUNK? ALL THE REVIEWS I HAVE READ SO FAR RATE IT WELL.
               
              dave1307 (11:38 PM, May 11, 2013)
              i suppose that ''snapsort website''
              have a preference ..... not normal that canon sx50 have this
              score...this is really a piece of junk...