Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Canon PowerShot S5 IS

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

59

Canon PowerShot S5 IS

38

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
11.2 EV
Shoots RAW
Supports RAW
Better editing
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S5 IS

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (117×80×78 mm)
Thickness
Thin
3.1"
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot S5 IS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$429 - $479

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$489 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$390

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot S5 IS Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$310 body only

$330 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Super zoom

$178 - $190

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Significantly larger
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$429 - $479

Wide angle Much better wide angle
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot S5 IS
PowerShot S5 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments