Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Canon PowerShot S3 IS

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

70

Canon PowerShot S3 IS

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S3 IS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.7
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot S3 IS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$326 body only

$397 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX80

Travel zoom

$368

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$340 - $429

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p No 24p support

Canon PowerShot S3 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$340 - $429

Screen size Much larger screen
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Super zoom

$180

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$199 - $257

Screen size Much larger screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot S3 IS
PowerShot S3 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments