Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

45

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

33

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
11.2 EV
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Screen size
Large screen
3"
Size
Really small
Compact (106×63×33 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Weight
Light-weight
233 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS.
Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$374 - $449

Zoom Significantly more zoom
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Overall image quality Much worse image quality
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$250

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$451

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Travel zoom

$439

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$274 - $349

Zoom More zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Travel zoom

$220

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS
PowerShot SX280 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments