Updated (August 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS vs Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810 vs Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Winner
Nikon Coolpix L810

45

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L810

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Size
Really small
Mid size (111×73×44 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.7"
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 47 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX160 IS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L810.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix L810 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$179 - $197

Battery life Much longer battery life
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Larger
Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$185

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820

Super zoom

$150

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Weight Slightly heavier

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

Travel zoom

$175

Weight Slightly lighter
Battery life Shorter battery life
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS

Canon PowerShot SX400 IS

Super zoom

$119 - $165

Wide angle Better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Super zoom

$179

Zoom More zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life

discussion

Nikon Coolpix L810
Coolpix L810
Nikon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
PowerShot SX160 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments