Updated (August 2013): Compare the Canon PowerShot S110 vs Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120 vs Canon PowerShot S110

Winner
Canon PowerShot S120

59

Canon PowerShot S110

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S120

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S110

Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×27 mm)
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Thickness
Thin
1.1"
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 7 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot S120.

competitors

Canon PowerShot S120 Competitors

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

Waterproof

$551

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$445 - $579

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$399

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot S110 Competitors

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$320

Dynamic range More dynamic range
GPS Has a GPS
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$445 - $579

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$498

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot S120
PowerShot S120
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot S110
PowerShot S110
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments