Canon PowerShot S120 vs Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot S120

61

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

37

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S120

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
Really small
Size
Compact (100×59×29 mm)
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 7 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot S120.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot S120 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$399

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200

Pro digicam

$304

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$215 - $257

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Battery life Much longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$229

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX540 HS

Canon PowerShot SX540 HS

Super zoom

$399

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$325 body only

$379 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Battery life Much longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot S120
PowerShot S120
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
PowerShot SX510 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments