Updated (September 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot S110 vs Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot S110 vs Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot S110

67

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

38

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S110

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (99×59×27 mm)
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot S110 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$490

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$440

GPS Has a GPS
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$379 - $399

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$260 - $349

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$249

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Significantly smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Travel zoom

$340

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Lowest price Cheaper
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Canon PowerShot S110
PowerShot S110
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
PowerShot SX260 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments