Updated (September 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot S110 vs Canon Powershot S100

Canon PowerShot S110 vs Canon Powershot S100

Tie
Canon PowerShot S110

50

Canon Powershot S100

48

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S110

Really small
Size
Compact (99×59×27 mm)
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Size
Really small
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.

competitors

Canon PowerShot S110 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$520

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$448

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$689

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$520

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$285 - $349

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$448

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot S110
PowerShot S110
Canon

Report a correction
Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments