Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Winner
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

100

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

79

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

High ISO
Light sensitivity
25,600 ISO
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,229k dots
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Battery life
Great battery life
320 shots
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Aperture Wider aperture
Focus points Slightly more focus points
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$449

Size Slightly smaller
Weight Lighter
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Pro digicam

$998 - $1,050

Focus points Many more focus points
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Touch screen No touch screen

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Pro digicam

$832 - $898

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Battery life Shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$537 - $698

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II

Pro digicam

$598

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
PowerShot G7 X Mark II
Canon

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments