Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Winner
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

100

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

79

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

High ISO
Light sensitivity
25,600 ISO
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,229k dots
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Battery life
Great battery life
320 shots
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Competitors

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$429 - $529

Size Slightly smaller
Weight Lighter
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Canon PowerShot G5 X

Canon PowerShot G5 X

Pro digicam

$699 - $799

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
External flash Supports an external flash
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Pro digicam

$811 - $898

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Touch screen No touch screen

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Pro digicam

$811 - $898

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Battery life Shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$549 - $598

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Aperture Wider aperture
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

discussion

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
PowerShot G7 X Mark II
Canon

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments