Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Winner
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

72

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
High ISO
Light sensitivity
25,600 ISO
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
50 fps
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
Light sensitivity
High ISO
25,600 ISO

competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Competitors

Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Travel zoom

$1,198

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Focus points Many more focus points
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Pro digicam

$605 - $648

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Touch screen No touch screen

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) Competitors

Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 (Lumix DC-TZ200)

Travel zoom

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Travel zoom

$1,198

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Focus points Many more focus points
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$598 - $600

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Built-in flash No built-in flash

discussion

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
PowerShot G7 X Mark II
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments