Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II vs Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Winner
Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

100

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

64

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Battery life
Great battery life
330 shots
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Optical
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II.
Explore our gallery of 24 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix X100T.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$565 - $679

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Supports 24p Supports 24p
External flash No external flash support
Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$579

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Size Smaller
External flash No external flash support
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$501 - $1,299

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

Fujifilm FinePix X100T Competitors

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F

Boutique

$1,190 - $1,299

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Weight Slightly heavier
Fujifilm X-T2

Fujifilm X-T2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,599 - $1,799 body only

$1,810 - $1,899 with 18-55mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
Size Slightly larger
Fujifilm XQ1

Fujifilm XQ1

Pro digicam

$391

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
PowerShot G1X Mark II
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix X100T
FinePix X100T
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments