Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II vs Canon PowerShot G5 X

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
Canon PowerShot G5 X

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II

Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G5 X

External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II Competitors

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Super zoom

$536 - $849

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$494 - $599

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Smaller
Sensor size Smaller sensor
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Smaller
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Canon PowerShot G5 X Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$370 - $399

Size Smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$494 - $599

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Battery life Longer battery life
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II
PowerShot G1X Mark II
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot G5 X
PowerShot G5 X
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments