Canon PowerShot G16 vs Samsung NX300

Winner
Canon PowerShot G16

58

Samsung NX300

44

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G16

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Great macro
Macro focus
1.0 cm
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Tunnel
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX300

Overall image quality
Great image quality
76.0
Screen size
Large screen
3.3"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G16.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX300.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G16 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$539 - $649

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Color depth Better color depth
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$589

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15

Pro digicam

$444

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Overall image quality Worse image quality

Samsung NX300 Competitors

Samsung NX3000

Samsung NX3000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$376 body only

$449 with 20-50mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Weight Slightly lighter
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Samsung NX500

Samsung NX500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$798 with 16-50mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Overall image quality Better image quality
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$548 body only

$698 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

discussion

Canon PowerShot G16
PowerShot G16
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung NX300
NX300
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments