Canon PowerShot G16 vs Samsung NX300

Winner
Canon PowerShot G16

60

Samsung NX300

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G16

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Tunnel
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX300

Screen size
Large screen
3.3"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1200 ms startup delay
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G16.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX300.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G16 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$450

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$595

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G3 X

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Super zoom

$710 - $799

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Samsung NX300 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$444 - $448 body only

$525 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$400 with 18-55mm lens

Lens availability Much more lenses available
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Samsung NX3000

Samsung NX3000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$500 with 20-50mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Weight Slightly lighter
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

discussion

Canon PowerShot G16
PowerShot G16
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung NX300
NX300
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments