Canon PowerShot G16 vs Samsung NX300

Winner
Canon PowerShot G16

74

Samsung NX300

51

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G16

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Tunnel
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX300

Overall image quality
Great image quality
76.0
Screen size
Large screen
3.3"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Color depth
Great color depth
23.6 bits

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G16.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX300.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G16 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$585

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$550

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15

Pro digicam

$310

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Lowest price Cheaper
Overall image quality Worse image quality

Samsung NX300 Competitors

Samsung NX500

Samsung NX500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,399 with 16-50mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Overall image quality Better image quality
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,298 body only

$1,498 - $1,746 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Focus points Many more focus points
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $498 body only

$578 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Canon PowerShot G16
PowerShot G16
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung NX300
NX300
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments