Canon PowerShot G16 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Tie
Canon PowerShot G16

49

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

48

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G16

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Great battery life
Battery life
360 shots
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Tunnel
Long exposures
Longest exposure
250 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/1.4
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Battery life
Great battery life
330 shots

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G16.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G16 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$498 - $1,299

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15

Pro digicam

$549

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Lowest price Cheaper
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$640 - $679

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$397 - $448

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P7800

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Pro digicam

$420

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Canon PowerShot G16
PowerShot G16
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
Lumix DMC-LX7
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments