Canon PowerShot G16 vs Nikon Coolpix P7800

Winner
Canon PowerShot G16

55

Nikon Coolpix P7800

51

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G16

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Great battery life
Battery life
360 shots
Long exposures
Longest exposure
250 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P7800

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Battery life
Great battery life
350 shots

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G16.
Explore our gallery of 6 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P7800.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G16 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$585

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$550

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$260 - $350

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix P7800 Competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$380 - $448

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Sony Cyber-Shot HX60

Travel zoom

$234 - $279

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520

Super zoom

$380

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

discussion

Canon PowerShot G16
PowerShot G16
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P7800
Coolpix P7800
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments