Canon PowerShot G16 vs Canon PowerShot G9

Winner
Canon PowerShot G16

53

Canon PowerShot G9

33

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G16

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Great battery life
Battery life
360 shots
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G9

Macro focus
Great macro
1.0 cm
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G16.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G9.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G16 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$453 - $649

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$589

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15

Pro digicam

$444

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Overall image quality Worse image quality

Canon PowerShot G9 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$699

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Much better image quality
External flash No external flash support
Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$650

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$498

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Sensor size Much larger sensor
Macro focus Significantly worse macro capability

discussion

Canon PowerShot G16
PowerShot G16
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot G9
PowerShot G9
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments