Advantages of the Canon PowerShot G15 |
 |
|
Supports 24p |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Get that real film feel |
|
|
 |
|
Records high-speed movies |
240 fps |
vs |
None |
|
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly better macro capability |
1 cm |
vs |
5 cm |
|
Focus on subjects 5x closer to the lens |
|
|
 |
|
Supports an external flash |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
An external flash often produces better looking flash images |
|
|
 |
|
Has a viewfinder |
Tunnel |
vs |
None |
|
A viewfinder can help save battery life by keeping the screen turned off |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly cheaper |
$443.99 |
vs |
$648.00 |
|
The best price we've seen is $204 cheaper (more than 30% less) |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly longer battery life |
350 shots |
vs |
330 shots |
|
Around 10% more shots per battery charge |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly faster max shutter speed |
1/4000s |
vs |
1/2000s |
|
2x faster max shutter speed |
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the Sony DSC-RX100 |
 |
|
Much larger sensor |
Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm |
vs |
1/1.8" 7.4x5.6mm |
|
Around 3x larger sensor |
|
|
 |
|
Much lower noise at high ISO |
390 ISO |
vs |
165 ISO |
|
The DSC-RX100 has excellent image quality 1.2 f-stops higher ISO than the PowerShot G15 |
|
|
 |
|
Much better image quality |
66.0 |
vs |
46.0 |
|
More than 40% better image quality |
|
|
 |
|
Much higher true resolution |
20 MP |
vs |
12 MP |
|
Capture around 70% more detail in your photos |
|
|
 |
|
Better color depth |
22.6 bits |
vs |
19.9 bits |
|
Distinguishes 2.7 more bits of color |
|
|
 |
|
More dynamic range |
12.4 EV |
vs |
11.5 EV |
|
0.9 f-stops more dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Better maximum light sensitivity |
25,600 ISO |
vs |
12,800 ISO |
|
The DSC-RX100's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly higher resolution screen |
1,229k dots |
vs |
922k dots |
|
More than 30% higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
|
Shoots significantly faster |
10 fps |
vs |
2.1 fps |
|
Around 5x faster continuous shooting |
|
|
 |
|
More focus points |
25 |
vs |
9 |
|
Set focus accurately within the frame |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly smaller |
101x59x36 mm |
vs |
106x75x40 mm |
|
More than 30% smaller |
|
|
 |
|
Lighter |
213 g |
vs |
352 g |
|
Around 40% lighter |
|
|
 |
|
Longer exposures |
30s |
vs |
15s |
|
2x longer exposures |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly thinner |
1.4" |
vs |
1.6" |
|
10% thinner |
|
|
|
|
|
Showing 4 comments