Canon PowerShot G15 vs Fujifilm FinePix x20

Canon PowerShot G15
Fujifilm FinePix x20

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G15

Large screen
Screen size
3"
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix x20

External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Badge
Phase detection autofocus
fast and accurate
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Macro focus
Great macro
1.0 cm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G15.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix x20.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G15 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16

Pro digicam

$399 - $417

Overall image quality Better image quality
Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$589

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$650

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Color depth Better color depth
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Fujifilm FinePix x20 Competitors

Fujifilm X30

Fujifilm X30

Pro digicam

$444 - $499

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Pro digicam

$449

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Autofocus Slower autofocus
Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70

Boutique

$650 - $699

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

discussion

Canon PowerShot G15
PowerShot G15
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix x20
FinePix x20
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments