Canon PowerShot G15 vs Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot G15

47

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G15

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
922k dots
Really small
Size
Mid size (107×76×40 mm)
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G15.
Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G15 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16

Pro digicam

$500

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$600

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$446

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Much better image quality
Dynamic range Less dynamic range

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$419 - $479

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Overall image quality Much worse image quality
Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Panasonic Lumix FZ72

Super zoom

$255 - $351

Wide angle Much better wide angle
3D Takes 3D photos
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$360

3D Takes 3D photos
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot G15
PowerShot G15
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments