Canon PowerShot G15 vs Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Tie
Canon PowerShot G15

46

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

45

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G15

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
Really small
Size
Mid size (107×76×40 mm)
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
11.5 EV
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Overall image quality
Great image quality
47.0
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G15.
Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G15 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16

Pro digicam

$440

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$390

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Much better image quality
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$600

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$398 - $479

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom Significantly more zoom
Overall image quality Much worse image quality
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$514 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Super zoom

$256 - $279

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot G15
PowerShot G15
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments