Updated (August 2013): Compare the Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS vs Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120 vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Winner
Canon PowerShot S120

65

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

41

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S120

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Size
Really small
Super compact (95×56×21 mm)
Macro focus
Great macro
1.0 cm
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
Weight
Light-weight
133 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 7 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot S120.

competitors

Canon PowerShot S120 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$545 - $649

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Focus points Many more focus points
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$439 - $449

Sensor size Much larger sensor
True resolution Much higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot S200

Canon PowerShot S200

Pro digicam

$400

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Compact

$229

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Macro focus Significantly worse macro capability
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Travel zoom

$99

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Cheaper
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$190 - $199

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Canon PowerShot S120
PowerShot S120
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS
PowerShot ELPH 130 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments