Olympus VG-160 vs Canon PowerShot A2500

Winner
Olympus VG-160

52

Canon PowerShot A2500

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus VG-160

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Super compact (96×57×19 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
Light-weight
Weight
125 g
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot A2500

Size
Really small
Super compact (98×56×21 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
Weight
Light-weight
125 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot A2500.

competitors

Olympus VG-160 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$650

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Size Significantly larger
Sony Cybershot DSC-W610

Sony Cybershot DSC-W610

Ultra compact

$145

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Size Slightly smaller
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony Cybershot W530

Sony Cybershot DSC-W530

Ultra compact

$225

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Screen size Much smaller screen

Canon PowerShot A2500 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Compact

$100

Wide angle Better wide angle
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot A1400

Canon PowerShot A1400

Compact

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Size Significantly larger
Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Compact

$199

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Olympus VG-160
VG-160
Olympus

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot A2500
PowerShot A2500
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments