Olympus VG-160 vs Canon PowerShot A2500

Winner
Olympus VG-160

57

Canon PowerShot A2500

54

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus VG-160

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Super compact (96×57×19 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
Light-weight
Weight
125 g
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot A2500

Size
Really small
Super compact (98×56×21 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
Weight
Light-weight
125 g
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot A2500.

competitors

Olympus VG-160 Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$769 - $997 body only

$1,099 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Much larger
Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Compact

$275

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Longest exposure Longer exposures
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Pentax Optio E60

Pentax Optio E60

Compact

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen size Much smaller screen

Canon PowerShot A2500 Competitors

Samsung WB35F

Samsung WB35F

Travel zoom

$255

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Size Larger
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$260

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX66

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX66

Compact

$355

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Weight Heavier

discussion

Olympus VG-160
VG-160
Olympus

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot A2500
PowerShot A2500
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments