Olympus VG-160 vs Canon PowerShot A2500

Winner
Olympus VG-160

49

Canon PowerShot A2500

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus VG-160

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot A2500

Longest exposure
Long exposures
15 seconds
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot A2500.

competitors

Olympus VG-160 Competitors

Olympus VG-180

Olympus VG-180

Compact

$139

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Lowest price Cheaper
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Compact

$94

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Battery life Longer battery life
Screen size Significantly smaller screen
Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Compact

$249

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Longest exposure Longer exposures
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

Canon PowerShot A2500 Competitors

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$319

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Lowest price More expensive
Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Compact

$249

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
Battery life Shorter battery life
Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Travel zoom

$230

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Olympus VG-160
VG-160
Olympus

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot A2500
PowerShot A2500
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments