Olympus VG-160 vs Canon PowerShot A2500

Winner
Olympus VG-160

50

Canon PowerShot A2500

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus VG-160

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Super compact (96×57×19 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot A2500

Size
Really small
Super compact (98×56×21 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.8"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot A2500.

competitors

Olympus VG-160 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix T500

Fujifilm FinePix T500

Travel zoom

$55

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Wide angle Better wide angle
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony CyberShot DSC-W730

Sony CyberShot DSC-W730

Travel zoom

$130

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Wide angle Better wide angle
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$268

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen size Much smaller screen

Canon PowerShot A2500 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S2900

Nikon Coolpix S2900

Compact

$131

Wide angle Better wide angle
Battery life Longer battery life
Aperture Narrower aperture
Samsung ST72

Samsung ST72

Ultra compact

$125

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Longest exposure Shorter max exposures
Canon PowerShot A2400 IS

Canon PowerShot A2400 IS

Compact

$149

Size Smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Olympus VG-160
VG-160
Olympus

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot A2500
PowerShot A2500
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments