Olympus VG-160 vs Canon PowerShot A2500

Winner
Olympus VG-160

48

Canon PowerShot A2500

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus VG-160

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot A2500

Thickness
Thin
0.8"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot A2500.

competitors

Olympus VG-160 Competitors

Olympus VG-120

Olympus VG120

Compact

Nikon Coolpix L31

Nikon Coolpix L31

Compact

$90

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen size Much smaller screen
Olympus VG-180

Olympus VG-180

Compact

$96

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Lowest price Cheaper
Screen size Much smaller screen

Canon PowerShot A2500 Competitors

Canon PowerShot A2600

Canon PowerShot A2600

Compact

$170

Screen size Much larger screen
Size Slightly smaller
Weight Slightly heavier
Nikon Coolpix S3700

Nikon Coolpix S3700

Travel zoom

$130 - $137

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 110 HS

Compact

$285

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Olympus VG-160
VG-160
Olympus

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot A2500
PowerShot A2500
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments