Olympus VG-160 vs Canon PowerShot A2500

Winner
Olympus VG-160

48

Canon PowerShot A2500

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus VG-160

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Super compact (96×57×19 mm)
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot A2500

Size
Really small
Super compact (98×56×21 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
Weight
Light-weight
125 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot A2500.

competitors

Olympus VG-160 Competitors

Olympus VG-140

Olympus VG-140

Compact

Macro focus Significantly worse macro capability
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160

Travel zoom

$99

Battery life Longer battery life
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Screen size Much smaller screen
Olympus VG-170

Olympus VG-170

Compact

$150

3D Takes 3D photos
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Canon PowerShot A2500 Competitors

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Travel zoom

$165

Macro focus Better macro capability
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Compact

$113

3D Takes 3D photos
Wide angle Better wide angle
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Canon PowerShot A2300 IS

Compact

$179

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Olympus VG-160
VG-160
Olympus

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot A2500
PowerShot A2500
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments