vs

Nikon Coolpix L28

43

Nikon Coolpix L28

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot A2500

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.8
Macro focus
Great macro
3 cm
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L28

Screen size
Large screen
3.0"
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Battery life
Great battery life
280 shots
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon A2500

Report a correction
Macro focus Much better macro capability 3 cm vs 10 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 3.3x closer to the lens
Aperture Wider aperture f/2.8 vs f/3.2
Help
At its widest zoom, the A2500's lens captures marginally more light (0.4 f-stops)
Size Smaller 98x56x21 mm vs 95x60x29 mm
Help
More than 30% smaller
Thickness Thinner 0.8" vs 1.1"
Help
Around 30% thinner
Weight Lighter 125 g vs 164 g
Help
More than 20% lighter
Longest exposure Longer exposures 15s vs 4s
Help
Around 4x longer exposures
Canon PowerShot A2500 Learn more about
the Canon A2500

Advantages of the Nikon L28

Report a correction
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Screen size Larger screen 3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Wide angle Better wide angle 26 mm vs 28 mm
Help
Around 10% better wide angle
Battery life Longer battery life 280 shots vs 220 shots
Help
Around 30% more shots per battery charge
Lowest price Slightly cheaper $87.99 vs $109.99
Help
The best price we've seen is $22 cheaper (more than 20% less)
Nikon Coolpix L28 Learn more about
the Nikon L28
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot A2500 Canon PowerShot A2500 52
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        43 Nikon Coolpix L28 Nikon Coolpix L28
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Lowest price Inexpensive Help
              A2500:$109.99
              L28:$87.99
              Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
              CCD
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
              1,600 ISO
              Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
              230k dots
              Movie format HD (720p) video Help
              A2500:720p @ 25fps
              L28:720p @ 30fps
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              5x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS

              Travel zoom

              $129 - $205

              Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
              Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

              Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

              Ultra compact

              $78

              Size Is slightly smaller
              Thickness Is thicker
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Nikon Coolpix S3500

              Nikon Coolpix S3500

              Compact

              $93 - $120

              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Nikon Coolpix S2700

              Nikon Coolpix S2700

              Compact

              $167

              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Nikon Coolpix S3600

              Nikon Coolpix S3600

              Travel zoom

              $87 - $97

              Aperture Has a significantly narrower aperture
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W710

              Compact

              $160

              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

              Compact

              $98

              3D Captures 3D images
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture

              Canon PowerShot A2500 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot A2600

              Canon PowerShot A2600

              Compact

              $99

              Screen size Larger screen
              Size Slightly smaller
              Weight Slightly heavier
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 135

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 135

              Travel zoom

              $99 - $153

              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Thickness Slightly thicker
              Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

              Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

              Travel zoom

              $159 - $180

              Screen size Larger screen
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Battery life Shorter battery life

              Nikon Coolpix L28 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon Coolpix L27

              Nikon Coolpix L27

              Compact

              $84

              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Screen size Smaller screen

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot A2500 Nikon Coolpix L28
              Canon PowerShot A2500
              Canon PowerShot A2500 Nikon Coolpix L28

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot A2500
              PowerShot A2500
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Nikon Coolpix L28
              Coolpix L28
              Nikon

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments