Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 310 HS vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 vs Canon IXUS 310 HS

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Canon IXUS 310 HS

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Great battery life
Battery life
400 shots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 310 HS

Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Canon IXUS 310 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Pro digicam

$778

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Thinner
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Samsung EX1

Samsung EX1

Pro digicam

$282

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Canon PowerShot S90

Canon PowerShot S90

Pro digicam

$479

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

Canon IXUS 310 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$532 - $649

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Smaller screen
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 - $498 body only

$479 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Touch screen No touch screen
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Travel zoom

$399

GPS Has a GPS
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Aperture Much narrower aperture

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon IXUS 310 HS
IXUS 310 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments