Updated (January, 2012): Compare the Canon IXUS 230 HS vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

vs

Canon IXUS 220 HS

58

Canon IXUS 220 HS

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.6
Light sensitivity
High ISO
12,800 ISO
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
10 fps
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Report a correction
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies 240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Macro focus Better macro capability 3 cm vs 5 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 40% closer to the lens
Wide angle Slightly better wide angle 24 mm vs 25 mm
Help
Almost the same
Longest exposure Longer exposures 15s vs 4s
Help
Around 4x longer exposures
Canon IXUS 220 HS Learn more about
the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Advantages of the Sony WX50

Report a correction
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The WX50's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
HDR Has in-camera HDR Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 460k dots vs 230k dots
Help
2x higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 10 fps vs 3.4 fps
Help
Around 3x faster continuous shooting
Aperture Slightly wider aperture f/2.6 vs f/2.7
Help
At its widest zoom, the WX50's lens captures marginally more light (0.1 f-stops)
Size Slightly smaller 92x52x19 mm vs 92x55x19 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller
Weight Lighter 117 g vs 141 g
Help
Around 20% lighter
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 Learn more about
the Sony WX50
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon IXUS 220 HS Canon IXUS 220 HS 58
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        66 Sony Cyber-shot WX50 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Size Fairly small Help
              IXUS 220 HS:92x55x19 mm
              WX50:92x52x19 mm
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Thickness Thin Help
              IXUS 220 HS:0.8"
              WX50:0.7"
              Weight Light weight Help
              IXUS 220 HS:141 g
              WX50:117 g
              Supports RAW No RAW support Help
              Less editing fidelity
              Screen size Very small screens Help
              2.7"
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              5x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

              Travel zoom

              $134 - $158

              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Canon IXUS 265 HS

              Canon IXUS 265 HS

              Travel zoom

              $188

              Zoom Has slightly more zoom
              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
              Canon IXUS 125 HS

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

              Compact

              $281

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Shutter lag Has slightly more shutter lag
              Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
              Canon PowerShot IXUS 240 HS

              Canon IXUS 240 HS

              Compact

              $359

              Screen size Has a significantly larger screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

              Canon PowerShot A4000 IS

              Travel zoom

              $135 - $180

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

              Travel zoom

              $199 - $259

              Zoom Has significantly more zoom
              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is significantly heavier

              Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Travel zoom

              $241

              Screen size Larger screen
              Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Size Larger
              Canon IXUS 155

              Canon IXUS 155

              Travel zoom

              $183

              Zoom More zoom
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Supports 24p No 24p support
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Canon IXUS 230 HS

              Canon IXUS 230 HS

              Travel zoom

              $281

              Screen size Larger screen
              Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Canon IXUS 115 HS

              Canon IXUS 115 HS

              Compact

              $285

              Screen size Larger screen
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Aperture Slightly narrower aperture

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Cybershot WX60

              Sony Cybershot WX60

              Travel zoom

              $215

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

              Travel zoom

              $98 - $108

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Lowest price Cheaper
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX70

              Ultra compact

              $100 - $170

              Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Sony Cybershot DSC-WX200

              Sony Cybershot DSC-WX200

              Travel zoom

              $305

              Zoom More zoom
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150

              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150

              Travel zoom

              $183

              Screen size Larger screen
              Zoom More zoom
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Size Larger

              appearance

              Canon IXUS 220 HS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
              Canon IXUS 220 HS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
              Canon IXUS 220 HS Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

              discussion

              Canon IXUS 220 HS
              IXUS 220 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50
              Cyber-shot WX50
              Sony

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments