Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Samsung WB700

Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Samsung WB700

Winner
Canon IXUS 220 HS

62

Samsung WB700

56

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB700

Zoom
Great zoom
18x
Screen size
Large screen
3"
Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×22 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB700.

competitors

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Travel zoom

$418

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Travel zoom

$119

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon IXUS 125 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

Compact

$101

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger

Samsung WB700 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$164

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$480

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Significantly larger
Samsung WB600

Samsung WB600

Travel zoom

Size Larger

discussion

Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung WB700
WB700
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments