Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Samsung WB700

Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Samsung WB700

Winner
Canon IXUS 220 HS

51

Samsung WB700

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB700

Screen size
Large screen
3"
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB700.

competitors

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Canon IXUS 125 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

Compact

$224

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Canon PowerShot IXUS 350 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 350 HS

Travel zoom

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon IXUS 265 HS

Canon IXUS 265 HS

Travel zoom

$233

Screen size Much larger screen
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

Samsung WB700 Competitors

Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$149

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Aperture Wider aperture
Size Significantly larger
Samsung WB750

Samsung WB750

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
3D Takes 3D photos
Size Larger
Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$158

Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Larger

discussion

Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung WB700
WB700
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments