Updated (September, 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 230 HS vs Samsung WB750

Canon IXUS 220 HS

Winner
Canon IXUS 220 HS

63

vs

Samsung WB700

57

Samsung WB700

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.7
Size
Really small
Super compact 92x55x19 mm
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Thickness
Thin
0.8"
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB700

Zoom
Great zoom
18x
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Report a correction
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Aperture Wider aperture f/2.7 vs f/3.2
Help
At its widest zoom, the IXUS 220 HS's lens captures marginally more light (0.5 f-stops)
Movie format Higher resolution movies 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video but at a lower frame rate
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies 240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Size Smaller 92x55x19 mm vs 99x59x22 mm
Help
More than 20% smaller
Weight Much lighter 141 g vs 245 g
Help
More than 40% lighter
Thickness Thinner 0.8" vs 0.9"
Help
More than 10% thinner
Canon IXUS 220 HS Learn more about
the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Advantages of the Samsung WB700

Report a correction
Zoom Significantly more zoom 18x vs 5x
Help
Around 13x more zoom
Screen size Larger screen 3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Samsung WB700 Learn more about
the Samsung WB700
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon IXUS 220 HS Canon IXUS 220 HS 63

vs

57 Samsung WB700 Samsung WB700

similarities

Compared to recent compacts

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Size Fairly small Help
IXUS 220 HS:92x55x19 mm
WB700:99x59x22 mm
Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
Lens
Thickness Thin Help
IXUS 220 HS:0.8"
WB700:0.9"
Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
You could stitch photos in post
Supports RAW No RAW support Help
Less editing fidelity
HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
You could do HDR manually
Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
IXUS 220 HS:230k dots
WB700:213k dots

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$479 - $498

Aperture Has a significantly wider aperture
Screen resolution Has a much higher resolution screen
Thickness Is thicker
Weight Is significantly heavier
Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$129 - $169

Screen resolution Has a slightly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weight Is significantly heavier
Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Travel zoom

$376 - $441

Screen resolution Has a slightly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Thickness Is thicker
Weight Is significantly heavier

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon IXUS 125 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

Compact

$300 - $405

Screen size Larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Shutter lag More shutter lag
Size Slightly larger
Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Travel zoom

$407

Screen size Larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Size Larger
Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS

Travel zoom

$179 - $204

Screen size Larger screen
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon IXUS 115 HS

Canon IXUS 115 HS

Compact

Screen size Larger screen
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
Canon IXUS 230 HS

Canon IXUS 230 HS

Travel zoom

Screen size Larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture

Samsung WB700 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Samsung WB750

Samsung WB750

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Macro focus Worse macro capability
Samsung WB650

Samsung WB650

Travel zoom

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Size Larger
Zoom Less zoom
Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$139 - $299

Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Macro focus Worse macro capability
Panasonic Lumix TZ40

Panasonic Lumix TZ40

Travel zoom

$239

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Larger
Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$163 - $259

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Thickness Thicker

appearance

Canon IXUS 220 HS Samsung WB700
Canon IXUS 220 HS
Canon IXUS 220 HS Samsung WB700

discussion

Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung WB700
WB700
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments