Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Samsung WB700

Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Samsung WB700

Winner
Canon IXUS 220 HS

51

Samsung WB700

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 24fps
Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB700

Size
Really small
Compact (99×59×22 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB700.

competitors

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Travel zoom

$230

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon IXUS 125 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

Compact

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger
Canon IXUS 115 HS

Canon IXUS 115 HS

Compact

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

Samsung WB700 Competitors

Samsung WB750

Samsung WB750

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Samsung WB600

Samsung WB600

Travel zoom

Size Larger
Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$269

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Weight Lighter
Size Larger

discussion

Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung WB700
WB700
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments