Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Canon IXUS 230 HS vs Panasonic Lumix FH10

Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

Tie
Canon IXUS 220 HS

56

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

56

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Battery life
Great battery life
260 shots
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
123 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8.

differences

Advantages of the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Report a correction
Movie format
Higher resolution movies
1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video but at a lower frame rate
High-speed framerate
Records high-speed movies
240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Supports 24p
Supports 24p
Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Sensor type
Has a CMOS-family sensor
CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
Continuous shooting
Shoots faster
3.4 fps vs 1.3 fps
Help
More than 2.5x faster continuous shooting
Macro focus
Better macro capability
3.0 cm vs 4.0 cm
Help
Focus on subjects around 30% closer to the lens
Lowest price
Cheaper
$173.97 vs $241.99
Help
The best price we've seen is $68 cheaper (around 30% less)
Fastest shutter speed
Faster max shutter speed
1/2000s vs 1/1600s
Help
20% faster max shutter speed
Longest exposure
Longer exposures
15s vs 8s
Help
Around 90% longer exposures
Canon IXUS 220 HS Learn more about
the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FH8

Report a correction
Panorama
Can create panoramas in-camera
Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Screen size
Larger screen
3" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Aperture
Wider aperture
f/2.5 vs f/2.7
Help
At its widest zoom, the DMC-FH8's lens captures marginally more light (0.2 f-stops)
Light sensitivity
Better maximum light sensitivity
6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The DMC-FH8's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better
Weight
Lighter
123 g vs 141 g
Help
More than 10% lighter
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 Learn more about
the Panasonic DMC-FH8
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Canon IXUS 220 HS Canon IXUS 220 HS 56
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        56 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths
              Size Fairly small Help
              IXUS 220 HS92×56×20 mm
              DMC-FH896×57×19 mm
              Aperture Wide aperture Help
              IXUS 220 HSf/2.7
              DMC-FH8f/2.5
              Wide angle Good wide angle Help
              24 mm
              Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
              1. Lens
              Thickness Thin Help
              IXUS 220 HS0.8"
              DMC-FH80.7"
              Weight Light weight Help
              IXUS 220 HS141 g
              DMC-FH8123 g
              Common Weaknesses
              Waterproof Not waterproof Help
              Stay on land
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              IXUS 220 HS3.4 fps
              DMC-FH81.3 fps
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
              230k dots
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              5x

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon IXUS 265 HS

              Canon IXUS 265 HS

              Travel zoom

              $187

              Screen resolution Has a slightly higher resolution screen
              Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
              Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
              Size Is slightly larger
              Canon PowerShot S120

              Canon PowerShot S120

              Pro digicam

              $349

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              Screen resolution Has a much higher resolution screen
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker

              Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon IXUS 125 HS

              Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

              Compact

              $173 - $188

              Screen size Larger screen
              Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
              Shutter lag More shutter lag
              Continuous shooting Shoots slower
              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Canon IXUS 255 HS

              Travel zoom

              $589

              Screen size Larger screen
              Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Size Larger
              Canon IXUS 230 HS

              Canon IXUS 230 HS

              Travel zoom

              Screen size Larger screen
              Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
              Wide angle Much worse wide angle
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Canon IXUS 115 HS

              Canon IXUS 115 HS

              Compact

              $243

              Screen size Larger screen
              Wide angle Much worse wide angle
              Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
              Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS (IXUS 275 HS)

              Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS (IXUS 275 HS)

              Travel zoom

              Screen size Larger screen
              Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
              Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
              High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Panasonic Lumix FS50

              Panasonic Lumix FS50

              Ultra compact

              $107

              Size Slightly smaller
              Longest exposure Much longer exposures
              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1

              Travel zoom

              $110

              Zoom Slightly more zoom
              Lowest price Cheaper
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH6

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH6

              Compact

              Battery life Longer battery life
              Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
              Screen size Smaller screen
              Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

              Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

              Ultra compact

              $78 - $80

              Size Smaller
              Lowest price Cheaper
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Nikon Coolpix S3300

              Nikon Coolpix S3300

              Compact

              $160

              Lowest price Cheaper
              Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
              Wide angle Worse wide angle

              appearance

              Canon IXUS 220 HS Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8
              Canon IXUS 220 HS
              Canon IXUS 220 HS Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

              discussion

              Canon IXUS 220 HS
              IXUS 220 HS
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8
              Lumix DMC-FH8
              Panasonic

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments