Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 vs Canon IXUS 220 HS

Tie
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

55

Canon IXUS 220 HS

54

Tie

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Great battery life
Battery life
260 shots
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
Light-weight
Weight
123 g
 

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 24fps
Size
Really small
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix JZ100

Fujifilm FinePix JZ100

Travel zoom

$159

Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed
Lowest price Cheaper
Screen size Much smaller screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$777 body only

$720 with 14-42mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Much larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS35

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS35

Travel zoom

Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Wide angle Much worse wide angle

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Travel zoom

$120 - $149

Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$449

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$199

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8
Lumix DMC-FH8
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments