Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 vs Canon IXUS 220 HS

Tie
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

52

Canon IXUS 220 HS

51

Tie

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.5
Large screen
Screen size
3"
Great battery life
Battery life
260 shots
Thin
Thickness
0.7"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Size
Really small
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Much larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Size Much larger
Panasonic Lumix FS50

Panasonic Lumix FS50

Ultra compact

$140

Size Slightly smaller
Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Screen size Much smaller screen

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$209

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon IXUS 125 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

Compact

$419

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly slower
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$699

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8
Lumix DMC-FH8
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments