Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P300

Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P300

Canon IXUS 220 HS
Nikon Coolpix P300

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
Light-weight
Weight
141 g
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P300

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/1.8
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Screen size
Large screen
3"
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P300.

competitors

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Canon IXUS 105

Canon IXUS 105

Compact

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Canon PowerShot ELPH 180

Travel zoom

$109

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 130 IS

Travel zoom

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix P300 Competitors

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$596 with 16-50mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$476

Supports 24p Supports 24p
GPS Has a GPS
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90

Waterproof

$130

Waterproof Waterproof
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Aperture Much narrower aperture

discussion

Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P300
Coolpix P300
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Sekar P777 (7:24 AM, February 13, 2012)
sorry for the wrong comment
 
Sekar P777 (7:14 AM, February 13, 2012)
is there any difference between 220hs and 300 hs, you ratings are differ from each other and your p300 ratings also different  please code the correct ratings. users beware