Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P300

Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P300

Canon IXUS 220 HS
Nikon Coolpix P300

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P300

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/1.8
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Battery life
Great battery life
240 shots
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P300.

competitors

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Canon IXUS 125 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

Compact

$23

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger
Canon IXUS 115 HS

Canon IXUS 115 HS

Compact

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Canon IXUS 255 HS

Canon IXUS 255 HS

Travel zoom

$450

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture

Nikon Coolpix P300 Competitors

Nikon 1 J1

Nikon 1 J1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$360 with 10-30mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340

Pro digicam

$380

True resolution Higher true resolution
Sensor size Larger sensor
Battery life Shorter battery life
Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310

Pro digicam

$499

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P300
Coolpix P300
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Sekar P777 (7:24 AM, February 13, 2012)
sorry for the wrong comment
 
Sekar P777 (7:14 AM, February 13, 2012)
is there any difference between 220hs and 300 hs, you ratings are differ from each other and your p300 ratings also different  please code the correct ratings. users beware