Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P300

Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P300

Canon IXUS 220 HS
Nikon Coolpix P300

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
Light-weight
Weight
141 g
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P300

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/1.8
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
8 fps
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P300.

competitors

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Canon PowerShot IXUS 145

Travel zoom

$231

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$209

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon IXUS 115 HS

Canon IXUS 115 HS

Compact

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

Nikon Coolpix P300 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P7000

Nikon Coolpix P7000

Pro digicam

$399

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Much larger
Nikon Coolpix P340

Nikon Coolpix P340

Pro digicam

$613

True resolution Higher true resolution
Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Lowest price Significantly more expensive
Nikon Coolpix P310

Nikon Coolpix P310

Pro digicam

$480

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P300
Coolpix P300
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Sekar P777 (7:24 AM, February 13, 2012)
sorry for the wrong comment
 
Sekar P777 (7:14 AM, February 13, 2012)
is there any difference between 220hs and 300 hs, you ratings are differ from each other and your p300 ratings also different  please code the correct ratings. users beware