Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P300

Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P300

Canon IXUS 220 HS
Nikon Coolpix P300

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
Light-weight
Weight
141 g
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P300

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/1.8
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Screen size
Large screen
3"
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P300.

competitors

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F

Boutique

$1,260 - $1,299

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Much larger
Fujifilm FinePix AV250

Fujifilm FinePix AV250

Compact

Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350

Ultra compact

$177

Size Smaller
Weight Lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix P300 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$579

Touch screen Has a touch screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Travel zoom

$319

Size Significantly smaller
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot S90

Canon PowerShot S90

Pro digicam

$449

Size Slightly smaller
Sensor size Larger sensor
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P300
Coolpix P300
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Sekar P777 (7:24 AM, February 13, 2012)
sorry for the wrong comment
 
Sekar P777 (7:14 AM, February 13, 2012)
is there any difference between 220hs and 300 hs, you ratings are differ from each other and your p300 ratings also different  please code the correct ratings. users beware