Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Winner
Canon IXUS 220 HS

49

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

35

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 220 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.7
Really small
Size
Super compact (92×56×20 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS.

competitors

Canon IXUS 220 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 190 IS

Travel zoom

$149

Zoom Slightly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

Travel zoom

$159

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$199

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Travel zoom

$317

Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Travel zoom

$275 - $279

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$195 - $199

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon IXUS 220 HS
IXUS 220 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
PowerShot SX230 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments