Updated (February 2012): Compare the Canon IXUS 115 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S3300

Canon IXUS 115 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S3300

Winner
Canon IXUS 115 HS

57

Nikon Coolpix S3300

54

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon IXUS 115 HS

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.8
Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Super compact (93×56×20 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S3300

Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
128 g
Size
Really small
Super compact (95×58×19 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Canon IXUS 115 HS.
Explore our gallery of 37 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S3300.

competitors

Canon IXUS 115 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot IXUS 160

Canon PowerShot IXUS 160

Travel zoom

$81 - $145

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot IXUS 170

Canon PowerShot IXUS 170

Travel zoom

$116 - $174

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon IXUS 125 HS

Canon PowerShot IXUS 125 HS

Compact

$222

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots slower

Nikon Coolpix S3300 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33

Waterproof

$107

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Aperture Wider aperture
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Nikon Coolpix S3700

Nikon Coolpix S3700

Travel zoom

$80 - $117

Wide angle Better wide angle
Battery life Longer battery life
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot IXUS 160

Canon PowerShot IXUS 160

Travel zoom

$81 - $145

Aperture Wider aperture
Battery life Longer battery life
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

discussion

Showing 0 comments