Sony Alpha a6500 vs Canon EOS M5

Sony Alpha a6500
Canon EOS M5

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha a6500

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
High ISO
Light sensitivity
51,200 ISO
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Many focus points
Focus points
425
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS M5

Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,620k dots
Weight
Light-weight
427 g
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons

competitors

Sony Alpha a6500 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$776 - $898 body only

$906 - $998 with 16-50mm lens

Battery life Longer battery life
Weight Lighter
Touch screen No touch screen
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$444 - $498 body only

$500 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen
Sony Alpha 7 II

Sony Alpha 7 II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,210 - $1,398 body only

$1,598 - $1,626 with 28-70mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen No touch screen

Canon EOS M5 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$444 - $498 body only

$500 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Lens availability Significantly more lenses available
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Canon EOS M3

Canon EOS M3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$359 - $679 body only

$485 with 15-45mm lens

Size Smaller
Thickness Thinner
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$776 - $898 body only

$906 - $998 with 16-50mm lens

Focus points Many more focus points
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen

discussion

Sony Alpha a6500
Alpha a6500
Sony

Report a correction
Canon EOS M5
EOS M5
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments